S.P.Chandra, v. The Commissioner,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.A.NO.1630 OF 2016
1. S.P.CHANDRA
2. M.PARVATHAM
3. S.SALMA BANU
4. S.SALMA BANU
5. S.UMAR FAROOQ
6. S.UMAR FAROOQ
7. K.BALENDRA
8. B.DEIVANAYAKI
9. M.J.BAKRUTHHEN ALI AHAMED
10. A.MOHAMED SALEEM
11. PUSHPARANI
12. S.MANIVANNAN
13. MANIMEGALAI
14. D.VIJAYAKUMAR
15. K.SIVAKUMAR
16. MURTHUZA HAROON
17. B.DEIVANAYAKI
18. G.DHANAPAL
19. S.SOWKATH ALI
20. MOYDEEN KOYAA
21. R.BHARATHI
22. V.DHANASEKARAN
23. ANIL SINGH
24. M.RAJENDRAN
25. T.MANOKARAN
26. S.CHITRAKALA
27. C.SYED RIASUDEEN
28. M.SURESH
29. A.SHANKAR
30. S.HARISHKUMAR
31. S.PACHAMUTHU
32. A.SHANKAR
33. S.LAKSHMI
34. B.SUBBULAKSHMI
35. C.MANI
36. B.J.JANAKIRAMAN
37. P.SINGARAM
38. M.SURESH KANNA
39. C.MANI
40. K.GEETHA
41. M.RAJENDRAN
42. R.MADHESWARAN
43. K.SUMATHI
44. N.RAJESH
45. M.NAMAGIRI
46. L.RAJAMUTHUKUMAR
47. N.SHAMEEM
48. N.SHAMEEM
49. R.RAMANATHAN
50. N.SIVABAKIYAM
51. S.H.SYED MURTHUZA
52. S.MADHESWARAN
53. R.JAYARAMAN
54. R.PRABHU
55. A.SHANKAR
56. N.ASHOK KUMAR
57. A.A.A.KUMAR
58. T.ANURADHA
59. R.PRABHU
60. V.MOHANASRINIVASAN
61. V.BALASUBRAMANIAM
62. R.JAYARAMAN
63. A.ANSAR BASHA
64. A.RAMADASS
65. ALLIRANI
66. A.MANIMEGALAI
67. R.A.ALAGARASAN
68. S.H.SYED MURTHUZA
69. C.MANI
70. G.DEEPARAM
71. A.RAMADASS
72. S.GUNASEKARAN ... Appellants vs.
1.
THE COMMISSIONER, SALEM CORPORATION, SALEM 2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AMMAPETTAI WARD OFFICE, SALEM CORPORATION, SALEM ... Respondents Prayer:- Appeal filed against the order passed by this Court dated 27.09.2016 in W.M.P.No.17896 of 2016 in W.P.No.20877 of 2016. W.P.No.20877 of 2016:- The Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying that in these circumstances stated therein and in the respective affidavits filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to call for the records of the respondents dated 05.04.2016 and 30.05.2016 in Na.Ka.No.L8/676/2016 and quash the same as illegal, unlawful without jurisdiction besides ultra vires.
W.M.P.No.17896 of 2016:- The Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the original impugned the respondents dated 05.04.2016 and 30.05.2016 in Na.Ka.No.L8/676/2016, pending disposal of the writ petition.
For appellant : Ms.R.Hemalatha For Respondents : Ms.K.Bhuaneswari, A.G.P.
J U D G M E N T
(made by Dr.Vineet Kothari, J.) The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the writ appeal has become infructuous. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent does not object to it. Hence the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.20271 of 2016 is also dismissed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tar To 1.
THE COMMISSIONER, SALEM CORPORATION, SALEM 2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AMMAPETTAI WARD OFFICE, SALEM CORPORATION, SALEM +1cc to Ms.R.Hemalatha, Advocate, S.R.No.101821 W.A.No.1630 of 2016 RGN(CO) CS/10/03/2020