Madras High CourtCRP/1971/2020dismissed with cost

Adarsh Balasubramanian v. Ramya Santhanagopalan

2020-11-20Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman2 pages

CRP(PD)No.1971 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN CRP(PD)No.1971 of 2020 CMP.No.12240 of 2020 Adarsh Balasubramanian Petitioner Vs Ramya Santhanagopalan Respondent Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Respondent to receive her articles as requested by her in IA.No.4 of 2019 in OP.No.4639 of 2018 within a time frame. For Petitioner :

Ms.Kavitha Deenadayalan

ORDER

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to direct the Respondent to receive her articles as requested by her in IA.No.4 of 2019 in OP.No.4639 of 2018 within a time frame.

2. This court heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Husband could submit that pending IA.No.4 of 2019 for return of the articles filed by the Wife, he has also given a email complaint to the Malaysian Police, who in turn have enquired about the return of the articles and he has also sought for permission of the Family Court to transport the articles of the Wife from Malaysia to India and such permission was also granted. Based on such permission, he has brought the RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

1/2 http://www.judis.nic.in

CRP(PD)No.1971 of 2020 Srcm articles from Malaysia and the articles are now lying in the Chennai Port Trust and this Civil Revision Petition has been filed, by the husband, seeking for a direction, directing the wife to take the articles.

4. On perusal of the order, IA.No.4 of 2019, for return of the articles filed by the Wife is still pending before the Family Court, Chennai. On getting permission for the transportation of the articles, on his own accord, the Petitioner/Husband has shifted the articles from Malaysia to Chennai Port for future compliance. The permission was given only for transportation of the articles. At this juncture, there cannot be any such direction given to the Wife, since on his own wish, he has shifted the articles. However, it is open to the Petitioner/Husband to move appropriate application before the Family Court since IA.No.4 of 2019 is still pending before the Family Court.

5. With the above observations, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, with costs. Consequently, the connected MP is closed. 20.11.2020 Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking Srcm CRP(PD)No.1971 of 2020 2/2 http://www.judis.nic.in