Madras High CourtWP/16011/2021dismissed as infructuous

S.S.Rajendran v. The District Collector

2021-09-06Honourable Mr Justice V.Sivagnanam,Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated 06.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM W.P. No.16011 of 2021 and WMP.No.16929 of 2021 S.S.Rajendran .. Petitioner

Versus

1. The District Collector, Villupuram District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

3. The Tahsildar, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

4. The Commissioner, Villupuram Municipality, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

5. The Regional Director, Municipal Administration, 50, Sarathi Nagar, Kagithapatrai, Vellore - 632012.

6. Sundari

7. Jothi

8. Ramachandran

9. Sundar 10.Viswanathan 11.A.R.Madhavan 12.Babu 13.Radhakrishnan 14.Khader 15.Thangasekar .. Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos.1 to 5 to consider the representation dated 28.11.2019 made by the petitioner herein to remove the encroachments made by the respondent Nos.6 to 12 at reserved area of Children's School and Playground in Muthuvel Layout, T.S.No.79 and 83 to the extent of 57 cents at Ward A, Block 82, Muthuvel Layout, K.K.Road, Villupuram, Villupuram District and pass appropriate orders within stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Court.

For petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish For respondents for RR1 to 5 : Mr.D.Ravichander for R8 to R11, 13, 14 : Mr.N.Suresh for R15 : Mr.P.Murali for R7 : No Appearance for R6 : Notice pending for R12 : Died

ORDER

(The Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J) The Writ Petition is heard through video conferencing.

2. The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 6 to 12 based on his representation dated 28.11.2019.

3. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

4. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 would state that based on the representation of the petitioner, the fourth respondent issued an order of demolition. Challenging the same, a batch of Writ Petition W.P.No.17541 of 2021, etc., have been filed and an interim order has also been issued.

5. In the light of the submissions of the learned State

Government Counsel, we are of the considered opinion that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To