← Library
Madras High Court(T)CMA(TM)/90/2023dismissed for nonprosecution

Amarnath Rameshbabu Sole Proprietor, M/S. Anrb Photo Artsitry, v. The Registrar Of Trade Marks

2023-11-23Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy2 pages

(T)CMA(TM)/90/2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.11.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY (T)CMA(TM)/90/2023 (OA/18/2020/TM/CHN) Amarnath Rameshbabu, Sole Proprietor, M/s.ANRB Photo Artsitry, No.2, P.S. Sivaswamy Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

... Appellant -vsThe Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Mark Registry, Boudhik Sampada Bhawan, G.S.T.Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

... Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (Trade Marks) filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying to stay the order dated 01.11.2019 passed by the Learned Examiner and set aside the same in Application No.3403590 pertaining to the mark BIG SHORT FILMS; this Appeal be allowed and registration of the Trade Mark BIG SHORT FILMS be granted to the Appellant based on Application No.3403590; the Court may direct the Registrar of Trade Marks, Chennai, to revert and or change the status of the Trade Mark BIG SHORT FILMS bearing Application No.3403590 in Class 41 and costs of these proceedings be awarded to the Appellant. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

(T)CMA(TM)/90/2023 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J kal For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Sakthivel, SPC **********

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed today under the caption "for dismissal" because the appellant was not represented at the hearing on 15.11.2023, in spite of notice being served on the appellant on 07.07.2023, as per the bailiff's report. At today's hearing, once again, the appellant continues to remain unrepresented.

2. Therefore, (T)CMA(TM)/90/2023 is dismissed for nonprosecution without any order as to costs. 23.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No kal (T)CMA(TM)/90/2023 (OA/18/2020/TM/CHN) 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis