← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/7678/2022ordered

Sivaraj v. State Rep By

2022-06-24Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.7678 of 2022 IN CRL RC.239/2022 SIVARAJ [ PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ] PROPRIETOR M/S.SIVA MEDICINES, Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE DRUG INSPECTOR, MANNARKUDI RANGE I/C, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DRUGS CONTROL, THANJAVUR ZONE NO.2975, GANDHIJI ROAD, THANJAVUR-613001.

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to (i) To exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the Trial Court in Connection with Non Baliable Warrant issued against the petitioner in C.C.3/2018 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvarur by the direction of Judgment passed in Crl.A.01/2020 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur dated 29.11.2021 for preferring the present Crl.R.C.No.239 of 2022. Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S I.ABRAR MOHAMED ABDULLAH, Advocate for the petitioner, and of M/S.S.VINOTH KUMAR, Govt. Advocate (Crl.

Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:- This petition is filed to exempt the petitioner from surrender on the Judgment and sentence imposed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvarur, 01.11.2019 in C.C.No. 03 of 2018 and confirmed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur, dated 29.11.2021 in C.A.No. 1 of 2020, pending the disposal of the present Criminal Revision Case.

2.I have perused the petition filed for exemption and I am not satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the application. 3.The Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Surya Baksh Singh Vs. State of U.P.1, has held in paragraph No.25, which reads as follows:- "The routine is to file an appeal, apply and get enlarged on bail or get exempted from surrender, and thereafter wilfully to become untraceable or unresponsive. It is the bounden duty cast upon the Judge not merely to ensure that an innocent person is not punished but equally not to become a mute spectator to the spectacle of the convict circumventing his conviction."

Similarly, in the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in Vivek Rai v. High Court of Jharkhand2, in paragraph No.3, has held as hereunder:- "We do not find any merit in the challenge to the validity of the Rule. It is well-known practice that generally a revision against conviction and sentence is filed after an appeal is dismissed and the convicted person is taken into custody in the Court itself. The object of the Rule is to ensure that a person who has been convicted by two courts obeys the law and does not abscond. The provision cannot thus be held to be arbitrary in any manner. The provision is to regulate the procedure of the Court and does not, in any manner, conflict with the substantive provisions of CrPC relied upon by the petitioners."

Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that in a routine manner, exemption from surrender cannot be granted.

4.In this case, there is no special and acceptable reasons assigned in the application for grant of exemption from surrender. Therefore, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for exemption shall stand dismissed. However, one more opportunity is granted to the

1. (2014) 14 SCC 222 : (2015) 1 SCC (Cri) 313 : 2013 SCC OnLine SC 919 25.

2. (2015) 12 SCC 86 : (2016) 1 SCC (Cri) 56 : 2015 SCC OnLine SC 95 at page 88

petitioner to surrender before 06.07.2022.

-sd/- 24/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVARUR.

2 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, THIRUVARUR.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

THE DRUG INSPECTOR, MANNARKUDI RANGE I/C, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DRUGS CONTROL, THANJAVUR ZONE NO.2975, GANDHIJI ROAD, THANJAVUR-613001.

C.C. to M/S I.ABRAR MOHAMED ABDULLAH Advocate on payment of necessary charges Order in CRL MP.7678/2022 in CRL RC.239/2022 Date :24/06/2022 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format TA-28/06/2022