R.Sachidhanantham v. The Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.08.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.20377 of 2004 R.Sachidhanantham

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Reddiarchathiram Panchayat Union, Reddiarchathiram, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.2025/04/A6 dated 06.07.2004 and quash the same and direct the respondents to restore the earlier allotment of 40 houses for the petitioner's Panchayat under the Indira Awaz Yozana (IAY) for the year 2004-2005 made on 03.06.2004.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manoj Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Government Advocate for R1 No appearance for R2

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas To

1. The Collector, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Reddiarchathiram Panchayat Union, Reddiarchathiram, Dindigul District.

+1cc to Government Pleader sr.63414 W.P.No.20377 of 2004 sv(co) ss(3/10/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/