← Library
Madras High CourtWP/13121/2024disposed of

P.Vijay v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2025-06-05Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH P.Vijay S/o.Late.Parthiban Petitioner Vs

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Housing And Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, (Formerly Slum Clearance Board) Rep. By its Chairman, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane, Chennai - 600 005. 3.The Estate Officer, Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Block-2, Estate Office-1, Kalayanapuram, Vyasarpadi, Chennai - 600 039.

Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to execute the sale deed of the land allotted by the second respondent situated in plot bearing No.219, measuring an extent of 0.70.0 sq.meter in Anbazhagan street, Anna Nagar, Korukkupet, Chennai - 600 1/4

021, in favour of petitioner and his mother and sisters' names based on petitioner's representation dated 03.02.2024 within the time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents : Ms.P.Aishwarya Government Advocate [R1] Mr.G.Sivakumar [R2 & R3] *****

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioner and his mother and sister based on the representation dated 03.02.2024.

2. Heard Mr.A.Saravanan, learned counsel for petitioner, Ms.P.Aishwarya, learned Government Advocate appearing for first respondent and Mr.G.Sivakumar, learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3.

3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 submitted that the third respondent will deal with the representation made by the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the allotment was made in 2/4

favour of the great grandfather and there are many legal heirs, who are claiming right over the property.

4. It is not necessary for this Court to deal with the merits of the case and it will suffice if a direction is given to the third respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner dated 03.02.2024 on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity to all the parties concerned and a decision shall be taken within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

05.06.2025 Index: Yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm N.ANAND VENKATESH, J 3/4

gm To 1.The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, (Formerly Slum Clearance Board) No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane, Chennai - 600 005. 3.The Estate Officer, Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Block-2, Estate Office-1, Kalayanapuram, Vyasarpadi, Chennai - 600 039.

05.06.2025 4/4