Victoria v. G.Maria Anthonyraj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 10.03.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.[PD] No.147 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.719 of 2016 Victoria W/o.Tharchuse, Arasakuli Village, Virudhachalam Taluk ... Petitioner Vs G.Maria Anthonyaraj W/o.Kabiral, Arasakuli Village, Virudhachalam Taluk ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decretal order in I.A.No.643 of 2013 in O.S.No.317 of 2013, dated 28.07.2015, on the file of Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari For Respondent : Mr.T.Sezhian for Ms.R.Meenal
O R D E R
Heard both sides.
2.
The defendant in the original suit is the petitioner herein. The respondent herein filed O.S.No.317 of 2013 on the file of the Sub
Court, Virudhachalam for specific performance based on the suit agreement of sale dated 05.01.2014. The property alleged to be agreed to be sold as per the agreement includes the land and building. 3.
The suit is resisted by the petitioner herein / defendant denying the execution of the agreement itself. Expressing an apprehension that the petitioner herein / defendant may cause damages to the building and demolish the building, the respondent herein / plaintiff filed I.A.No.643 of 2013 for appointment of a Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit property. The revision petitioner/defendant has made it clear in the counter affidavit that she is not going to demolish the building. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the said averment in the counter affidavit may be taken as an undertaking. In the light of the said submission, the need for appointing a Commissioner to visit the suit property and find the value of the superstructure vanishes. In view of the same, the order of the trial Court appointing a Commissioner is liable to be interfered with and set aside. 4.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The order of the trial Court dated 28.07.2015 is set aside. Application
No.643 of 2013 shall stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
10.03.2016 srn To The Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam.
P.R.SHIVAKUMAR, J srn C.R.P.[PD] No.147 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.719 of 2016 10.03.2016