← Library
Madras High CourtWP/36609/2016dismissed

S.Srinivasan v. The Additional Chief Secretary

2022-11-03Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and W.M.P.Nos. 31478 & 31479 of 2016 S. Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs.

Additional Chief Secretary Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce, Department of Industries, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order dated 23.09.2016 of the respondent herein in proceedings No. 28578/PMT4/2015 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to permit the petitioner to join the service as Driver in the Directorate of Industries and Commerce, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032 and consequently direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner for transfer to District Industries Centre, Thiruvallore.

For Petitioner : Ms. Meena Rukumani for M/S. AL. Ganthimathi For Respondent : Mr. S. Balamurugan Government Advocate

O R D E R

The order of transfer dated 23.09.2016, posting the writ petitioner from Chennai to Karur, is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The impugned order of transfer, reveals that the petitioner went on leave and on expiry of leave, he submitted an application for joining duty. At that point of time, on administrative grounds, the respondent issued an order of transfer, transferring the writ petitioner to Karur. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. Transfer is an incidental to service, more so, a condition of service. The post or place can never be claimed as a matter of choice by the Government servants. The competent authorities are empowered to effect transfers in the public interest and to run the public administration in a smooth manner. The High Court in exercising the powers of Judical Review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is not expected to interfere with the routine administration of the Government departments. The competent authorities are bound to assess the public interest and

accordingly, post the employees for efficient public administration. In the present case, the petitioner, on expiry of leave, submitted a joining report and he was post at Karur, instead of joining, he filed the present writ petition.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent now furnished a copy of the order issued by the Commissioner of Industries and Commerce in proceedings dated 01.08.2022, which reveals that, on administrative grounds, the petitioner was transferred to office of the Regional Joint Director, Guindy, Chennai.

5. In view of the said transfer order issued on 01.08.2022, no further consideration is required. That apart, the impugned order of transfer is also not infirm. For all these reasons, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 03.11.2022 mrn Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-Speaking order

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

mrn To The Additional Chief Secretary Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce, Department of Industries, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

and W.M.P.Nos. 31478 & 31479 of 2016 03.11.2022