K.S.Palanivel M/A 49 Years, v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.02.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Review Application Nos.232 to 238 of 2018 and C.M.P.Nos.16736 to 16742

1. Mrs.Arti Meenakshi Muthiah

2. Mr.Tarun Ghai

3. Mrs.Supriya Ananth Reddy 4.Sir M.Ct.Muthaiya Chiettiar Higher Sec.

School Trust, rep.by its President, No.23, Raja Annamalai Road, Purasawalkam, Chennai 600084.

5.Lady M.Ct. Muthiah Chettiar Higher Sec.

School Trust, rep.by its President, No.13/14, Alagappa Road, Purasawalkam, Chennai 600084.

..Petitioners in all Petition/Respondent vs Mrs. Kamala Muthiah ..Respondent in all Petition/Respondent Prayer: Review Applications filed to review and reconsider the Common Order dated 25.06.2018 passed in the O.S.A.No.157 to 163 of 2017.

Prayer: OSA.WP.157 to 163 of 2017 Original side Appeals filed under order XXXVI Rule 9 of the O.S Rules read with clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 28/04/2017 and made in the exercise of the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of the High Court in O.A Nos. 126,127 and 128 of 2017 and A.Nos. 858,859,860 and 861 of 2017 respectively in C.S.No. 87 of 2017.

For petitioners : Mr.Najeeb Usman Khan in all Review Petition For respondent : No appearance in all Review Petition COMMON ORDER [Order of this Court was delivered by M.M. SUNDRESH,J.] The above Review Applications have been filed seeking to review the Order passed by us in O.S.A.Nos.157 to 163 of 2017 on 25.06.2018.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Review Applicant submitted that the amount ordered by this Court payable to the overseer is excessive. Learned counsel also made some submissions on the manner in which the learned overseer performs.

3. We do not find that these submissions would be sufficient grounds for passing the order. We do not find any material to substantiate the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant especially when the case has reached trial stage. It is informed that P.W.1 is being cross examined. Therefore, at this stage we are not inclined to pass any orders which might delay the trial further. Suffice it to state that the learned single Judge may see to it that the trial is expedited.

4. Accordingly, the Review Petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected M.Ps are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ggs

To The Sub Assistant Registrar(O.S), High Court, Madras - 104 +7cc to M/s.Najeeb Usman Khan, Advocate, S.R.No.12772 Review Application Nos.232 to 238 of 2018 And C.M.P.Nos.16736 to 16742 SSV(CO) RN(03/06/2020)