Ameena v. B.Ali Akbar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16-12-2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA C.R.P.(PD).No.1546 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.8408 of 2016 Ameena .. Petitioner Vs.

B.Ali Akbar .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the learned II Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai, to hear and dispose of I.A. bearing S.R.No.... of 2016 in O.S.No.143 of 2014, filed under Section 13 of the Family Courts Act, by way of taking the same on file, grant permission to the petitioner to engage an Advocate of her choice for the purpose of representing her in O.S.No.143 of 2014 and all other connected I.As. subsequently thereafter.

For petitioner : Mr.R.Ramachandran For respondent : Mr.N.Kishorekumar

ORDER

The above Civil Revision Petition is filed by the wife in matrimonial proceedings before the II Additional Family Court, Chennai, refusing permission to engage a counsel to appear on behalf of her. It is now stated by the learned

counsel for the petitioner that he himself is appearing for the same petitioner before the Court below and filed vakalat for appearing on behalf of her before the Family Court. Hence, nothing further survives for consideration in this Civil Revision Petition, which is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, C.M.P. is closed.

16-12-2016 cs Copy to The Second Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J cs C.R.P.(PD).No.1546 of 2016 16.12.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in