Arati Rao v. Karoon P. Rao And 4 Others

A.No.3538 of 2022 in O.P.No.66 of 2022 A.No.3538 of 2022 in O.P.No.66 of 2022 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., The present application has been filed by the applicant / petitioner to amend the Original Petition as per the details mentioned in the application.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.

3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that the 3rd respondent, who is the son-in-law of the deceased and not at all a legal heir of the deceased, was inadvertently, impleaded as 3rd respondent, therefore, the applicant has come up with this application to delete the name of the 3rd respondent, wherever it has been referred in the body of the Original Petition.

4. Considering the above said submission of the learned counsel for the applicant and in view of the fact the 3rd respondent / son-in-law, is not a beneficiary under the Will, this Court is of the view that it is appropriate to allow the application.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.No.3538 of 2022 in O.P.No.66 of 2022 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., Accordingly, the present application is allowed. The learned counsel for applicant is directed to carryout the amendment within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 29.08.2022 ssd A.No.3538 of 2022 in O.P.No.66 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis