Madras High CourtCRL A/755/2006dismissed as infructuous

A.Eswaran @ Sankar v. State Rep.By

2018-01-06Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.01.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Crl.A.No.755 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 A.Eswaran @ Sankar .. Appellant/Accused Vs.

State.rep.by The Inspector of Police, Chennimalai Police Station, Erode District.

(Cr.No.134/03) .. Respondent/.Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C, to call for the records in S.C.No.171 of 2003 on the file of the learned Addl. Sessions Court Fast Track No.1), Erode, peruse and set aside the judgment dated 29.11.2004 For Appellant : Mr.R.Sreerangan For Respondent: Ms.P.Kritika Kamal Government Advocate

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant stated that the appellant had already undergone a period of imprisonment awarded by the Trial Court and hence nothing survives in this Appeal. 2.The learned Government Advocate had also confirmed that the appellant was released on 16.05.2008 from the Central Prison, Coimbatore.

3.As the learned counsel for the appellant himself does not wish to argue the appeal on merits, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-vii) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

kas To

1. THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, FAST TRACK COURT NO.1), ERODE.

2. DO-THRO- THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, ERODE.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENNIMALAI POLICE STATION, ERODE DISTRICT.

4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERUNDURAI

6. DO-THRO-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERODE.

7. THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISON, COIMBATORE.

8. THE SECTION OFFICER, CRIMINAL SECTION, HIGH COURT, MADRAS. (2 COPIES) Crl.A.No.755 of 2006 AK(CO) TR(07/02/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/