H.R.Nagaraj, v. The Inspector General Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :19.09.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.36854 of 2016 H.R.Nagaraj ..Petitioner vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3.H.Ilyaz Khan .. Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jayaprrakash For Respondents : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, GA for R1 & R2 Mr.V.Raghavachari for R3

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents made a submission that during the pendency of the writ petition, the District Registrar passed an order after adjudication.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Thus, no further adjudication is required in respect of the grounds raised in this writ petition. The writ petitioner is at liberty to redress his grievances in the manner known to law. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road,Chennai - 600 028. 2.The District Registrar, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

+2cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate sr.no.65305 +1cc to Government Pleader sr.no.65821 W.P.No.36854 of 2016 ev(co) nr 05/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/