Selvi Kannan v. State Represented By

K.KUMARESH BABU , J.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.182 of 2024 registered by the respondent Police for the offences under Sections 294, 323, 506 (i) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner and the defacto complainants are running a tiffin shop and iron shop, respectively, in the same area. Due to vengeance, the defacto complainant had spread rumours about the petitioner and abused her in filthy language. They also attacked the petitioner and the person working in the petitioner's shop. There is also a counter case registered against the defacto complainant, based on the complaint given by the petitioner's daughter, in crime No.183 of 2024. He further stated that the petitioner is an innocent person and a false case has been foisted against her. Thus, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) stated that there was a quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainants. It is 1/4

alleged that the petitioner and her workman attacked the defacto complainant, thereby causing injuries. It is also stated that the injured have been discharged from the hospital. Thus, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

4.Taking all the factors into consideration and the fact that the injured have been discharged from hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Poonamallee, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the 2/4

Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC;

09.05.2024 sli 3/4

K.KUMARESH BABU , J.

sli 09.05.2024 4/4