← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/11962/2025granted

Selvam v. The Sate Rep By The Inspector Of Police

2025-04-23Honourable Mr.Justice Sunder Mohan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.11962 of 2025 Selvam .. Petitioner Vs.

The State rep by Inspector of Police EOW, Team IV, Ashok Nagar, Chennai.

(Crime No.02 of 2025) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.02 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Vivekananthan For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.02.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.02 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 316(5), 318(4) r/w 3(5) of BNS and Section 21(1), 21(2), 21(3) of BUDS Act. Page No.1 of 6

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner induced the victims to invest in a company by the name Lakshmi Classic Homes Pvt. Ltd, promising of high returns; that the said company defrauded about 26 depositors to the tune of Rs.3,71,40,146/-; and that the petitioner, acting as an agent, received a commission of Rs.5,00,000/- from the main accused and thus, committed aforesaid offences.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner himself had deposited money into the account of the company and is also a victim; that he in a bonafide intention believed that the company would provide high returns and, on that belief, he introduced other depositors; and that in any case, further custody of the petitioner is not required and prayed that the petitioner may be released on bail. 4.

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner acted as an agent; that the petitioner induced other victims to Page No.2 of 6

invest in the company; that the petitioner himself had invested in the said company and that received a commission of Rs.5,00,000/- for introducing the other depositors.

5.

Admittedly, the petitioner had also invested money in the said company. The petitioner acted as an agent for the other depositors. Considering the role played by the petitioner, period of incarceration, and since further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court under TNPID, Chennai, and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; Page No.3 of 6

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

23.04.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No dpa Page No.4 of 6

To 1.The Inspector of Police EOW, Team IV, Ashok Nagar, Chennai.

2.The Special Court under TNPID, Chennai.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Puzhal.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page No.5 of 6

SUNDER MOHAN , J.

dpa Crl.O.P.No.11962 of 2025 23.04.2025 Page No.6 of 6