Madras High CourtCRP/164/2016dismissed as infructuous

Kanimozhi v. Saraswathi

2016-10-04Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.10.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.164 & 165 of 2016 and C.M.P.Nos.866 & 867 of 2016 Kanimozhi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Saraswathi ... 1st respondent in C.R.P.164 of 2016 & 2nd respondent in C.R.P.165 of 2016 2.Angalammal ... 2nd respondent in C.R.P.164 of 2016 & 1st respondent in C.R.P.165 of 2016 3.Rajathi ... 3rd respondent in C.R.P.164 of 2016 & 4th respondent in C.R.P.165 of 2016 4.Bhuvaneswari ... 4th respondent in C.R.P.164 of 2016 & 3rd respondent in C.R.P.165 of 2016 5.The Block Development Officer, Returning Officer/Commissioner, Kandamangalam Panchayat Union, Villupuram Taluk & District.

6.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Villupuram Taluk & District.

... Respondents 5 & 6 in both C.R.Ps.

Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the common order dated 20.11.2015 made in Election O.P.No.165 & 171 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram.

M. DURAISWAMY,J.

va For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunagiri For Respondents : Mr.T.Jayaramaraj, Government Advocate (R5 & R6) R1 to R4 - no appearance C O M M O N O R D E R Since the Civil Revision Petitions are filed challenging the local body elections held in the year 2011, the same have become infructuous for the reason that the elections for the local body for the year 2016 has been notified by the Government.

2.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Index : No 04.10.2016 Internet : Yes va To The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.

C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.164 & 165 of 2016 and C.M.P.Nos.866 & 867 of 2016