Madras High CourtWP/29249/2015closed

M/S.M.P.Shan Tex, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-04-25Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.04.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.29249 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 M/s.M.P.Shan Tex, Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.P.Uma Shanker, Plot No.E-6 & G-10, Sipcot Industrial Growth Centre, P.V.Palayam Post, Perundurai-638 052.

..Petitioner/Petitoner ..Vs..

1.The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Chennimalai Police Station, Chennimalai, Erode.

2.A.Prabhu 3.P.Senthil Kumar 4.E.Anandharaj 5.S.Sankar 6.V.Selvaraj ..Respondents.

Prayer:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner's No.1 factory at M/s.M.P.Shan Tex, situated at Plot No.E-6 F-20 & G-10, Sipcot Industrial Growth Centre, P.V.Palayam Post, Perundurai-638 052 by effectively preventing the respondents 2 to 6 and their associates so as to enable the petitioner to run the industry with the workers willing to work, for the ingress and egress of material and to remove the transport the finished products, materials, from the petitioner's premises.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioner : Mr.Ezhil Raj For Respondents: Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate for R-1 No Appearance for R-2 to R-6

ORDER

The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to direct the 1st respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner's No.1 factory at at M/s.M.P.Shan Tex, situated at Plot No.E-6 F-20 & G-10, Sipcot Industrial Growth Centre, P.V.Palayam Post, Perundurai-638 052 by effectively preventing the respondents 2 to 6 and their associates so as to enable the petitioner to run the industry. 2.The complaint against the respondents 2 to 6 was filed by the writ petitioner in the year 2015, more than 2 1⁄2 years lapsed, and therefore, the relief as such sought for in this writ petition deserves no further consideration. However, if any grievance exist for the writ petitioner, then the writ petitioner is at liberty to initiate appropriate action in the manner known to law.

3.With these observations, the writ petition stands closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar KP To The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Chennimalai Police Station, Chennimalai.

W.P.No.29249 of 2015 MR(CO) TR(14/05/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/