← Library
Madras High CourtWP/29293/2015disposed of

P.Thamizharasan v. The Senior Regional Manager

2015-09-16Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.09.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.29293 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 P.Thamizharasan ..

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Coimbatore.

2.The District Manager/Deputy Collector, TASMAC Ltd., Tiruppur.

..

Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to Pro.Na.Ka.No.1304/A/2015 dated 29.07.2015 insofar as the petitioner is concerned passed by the second respondent, quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with consequential benefits.

For Petitioner ..

Mr.G.Punniyakotti For Respondents ..

Mr.C.Kasirajan (for TASMAC)

ORDER

By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.The petitioner, while working as Supervisor at TASMAC Shop No.1958, was placed under suspension by the second respondent vide order dated 29.07.2015 alleging that while conducting surprise inspection, there was a stock deficit of Rs.3,02,924/-. The petitioner, in this regard, has submitted a representation dated 03.08.2015, praying for revocation of the order of suspension, to the first respondent and since no orders have been passed, came forward to file this writ petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Heard the submissions of Mr.G.Punniyakotti, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.C.Kasirajan, learned standing counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.Though the petitioner prayed for a larger relief, this Court, in the light of the above facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner, directs the petitioner to give one more representation to the second respondent from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The second respondent, on receipt of the same, is directed to consider the same in accordance with law and pass orders within a further period of six weeks thereafter and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmi To 1.The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Coimbatore.

2.The District Manager/Deputy Collector, TASMAC Ltd., Tiruppur.

+1cc to Mr.C. Kasirajan, Advocate, S.R.No.50674 +1cc to Mr.G. Punniyakotti, Advocate, S.R.No.50687 MSM(CO) EU(05/10/2015) W.P.No.29293 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/