Madras High Court(T)OP(TM)/392/2023dismissed for nonprosecution

M/S. Mahaveer Manufacturing v. M/S. Suraj Metal Industries

2025-06-12Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY (T)OP(TM)/392, 393/2023 (ORA/106, 107/2020/TM/CHN) M/s. Mahaveer Manufacturing Mr. Dhanaraj Gandhi Alias Mr Dhanraj Jain Proprietor of M/s. Mahaveer Manufacturing 13/A, D'souza Compound, Kherani Road, Near St.Anthon's Church, Sakinaka, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 072. ... Petitioner in both petitions -vs1.M/s. Suraj Metal Industries Plot No.99, 8th Main, 3rd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bangalore 560 058.

2.The Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, The Office of the Trade Marks, Registry I.P.Building, Industrial Area, G.S.T.Road, Chennai 600 032. ... Respondents in both petitions PRAYER in (T)OP(TM)/392/2023: Transfer Original Petition (Trade Marks) is filed under Sections 47(1)(a) & (b), 50(ii) and 57(2)(3) of the 1/4

Trade Marks Act, 1999, pleased to an Entry relating to the above registered trade mark Kaviraj Friendly bearing no.1980802 Registered in Class 07 in the name of M/s.Suraj Metal Industries be expunged and removed as per provisions PRAYER in (T)OP(TM)/393/2023: Transfer Original Petition (Trade Marks) is filed under Sections 47(1)(a) & (b), 50(ii) and 57(2)(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, pleased to an entry relating to the above reistered trade mark 'Kaviraj' bearing no.2845266 Registered in Class 07, in the name of M/s.Suraj Metal Industries be expunged and removed as per provisions. For Petitioner : No Appearance in both petitions For Respondent : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar for R1 in both petitions Mr.Rajesh Vivekananthan, Deputy Solicitor General for R2 ********** COMMON ORDER Mr.Arun C.Mohan, learned counsel, had entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner. At the hearing on 13.03.2025, he filed a memo 2/4

dated 13.03.2025 stating that he had no instructions from the client to proceed further with the case. Therefore, the matter was adjourned to 17.04.2025 so as to enable the petitioner to engage an alternative counsel. There was no representation for the petitioner on 17.04.2025. The matter was adjourned in order to provide a further opportunity. At the hearing today, the petitioner remains unrepresented.

2. Therefore, (T)OP(TM)/392, 393/2023 are dismissed for nonprosecution without any order as to costs. 12.06.2025 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No To The Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, The Office of the Trade Marks, Registry I.P.Building, Industrial Area, G.S.T.Road, Chennai 600 032.

3/4

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J rna (T)OP(TM)/392, 393/2023 (ORA/106, 107/2020/TM/CHN) 12.06.2025 4/4