← Library
Madras High CourtWP/15102/2023dismissed

Saravanan v. The Managing Director

2025-08-19Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.08.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.15102 of 2023 and WMP No.14591 of 2023 Saravanan .... Petitioner .Vs.

1.The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board Kamarajar Salai, Chennai 600 005.

2.The Executive Engineer Division-III Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board T.P.Chathiram, Chennai 600 010.

3.The Estate Officer Division-III Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board T.P.Chathiram, Chennai 600 010.

4.C.V.Anandhanarayanan 5.C.V.Gowri 6.Lakshmi Radhakrishnan .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to Se.Mu.Ka.No.G3/4476/2023 dated 11.8.2023 on the file of 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and ultravires.

(Prayer amended vide order dt.19.8.2025 made in WMP.25281/2023 in WP.15102/2023 by NAVJ) 1 / 4

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondents :

Mr.R.Sendhil Kumar for R6

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 11.8.2023 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to sustain the allotment made in favour of the petitioner. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.

3.It is an admitted case that the original allotment was made in favour of one Mathrubootham. It is also an admitted case that the legal heirs of Mathrubootham are R4, R5 and R6. The petitioner claims to be a person who took care of Mathrubootham and on that basis, he has managed to get the allotment transferred in his name through proceedings dated 05.4.2023. On the complaint made by the 6th respondent, the same has been cancelled through the impugned proceedings dated 11.8.2023. 4.It is quite surprising that the petitioner has been recognized as the legal heir of Mathrubootham on the only ground that he took care of Mathrubootham. The actual 2 / 4

legal heirs are R4 to R6. There is something more than what meets the eye in this case. The proceedings dated 05.4.2023 is per se illegal since the allotment has been made in favour of the petitioner by recognizing him as a legal representative of Mathrubootham. Subsequently, it has been rightly cancelled through the impugned proceedings dated 11.08.2023.

5.The impugned proceedings dated 11.8.2023, issued by the 1st respondent does not suffer from any illegality warranting the interference of this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

19.08.2025 Index : Yes/No NCS : Yes/No KP 3 / 4

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

KP To 1.The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board Kamarajar Salai Chennai 600 005.

2.The Executive Engineer Division-III Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board T.P.Chathiram, Chennai 600 010.

3.The Estate Officer Division-III Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board T.P.Chathiram Chennai 600 010.

Writ Petition No.15102 of 2023 19.8.2025 4 / 4