C.Gopalakrishnan v. Natesan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :14.11.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN C.R.P (PD) No.1762 of 2012 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 Mr.C.Gopalakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs.
Mr.Natesan ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set the order dated 01.02.2012 and made in E.P.No.39 of 2009 in O.S.No.186 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri. For Petitioner : M/s.Iyer and Thomas For Respondent : Mr.K.Thiruvengadam
ORDER
Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has made an endorsement on the reverse of the memorandum of revision petition saying that the execution filed by the respondent decree holder was already terminated and therefore nothing survives in the revision petition
and hence the revision may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Keeping in view of the above fact as well as the endorsement made, the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 14.11.2016 gpa
T.MATHIVANAN.J., gpa C.R.P (PD) No.1762 of 2012 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 14.11.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in