V.Arulmozhi, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.10.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.20919 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 V.Arulmozhi ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, (PD Section), Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2. Jairudeen, Block Development Officer, Bargur Panchayat Union, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the charge memo dated 7.3.2012 bearing ROC.No.5727/2011 K1 of the first respondent and quash the same. For petitioner : Ms.T.Hemalatha For 1st respondent : Mr.R.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader For 2nd respondent : Mr.P.S.Sivashannmmugasundaram

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed, as infructuous. He had also made an endorsement to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2012 is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar asvm To The District Collector, (PD Section), Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

+1cc to M/s.V.Suthakar, Advocate, S.R.No.56678 W.P.No.20919 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 MP(CO) CA(06/11/2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/