← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14584/2025disposed of

V.A.R.Kumar v. The Commissioner

2025-07-09Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.07.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA V.A.R.Kumar .. Petitioner vs 1.The Commissioner Panruti Municipality, Panturi, Cuddalore District - 607 106.

2.The Managing Director Municipal Administration MRC Nagar Santhome High Road Chennai - 600028.

3.The Regional Director Municipal Administration Chengalpattu Zone Kattankolathur, Maraimalai Nagar, Chennai 4.The District Collector Cuddalore District Cuddalore 5.Mr.Rajendran ... Respondents 1/5

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.02.2025, take suitable action on the said representation against the 5 th respondent in accordance with law.

For Petitioner :

Mr.C.S.Dhanasekaran For Respondents :

Mr.D.Ravichandran, SGP for R1.

Mr.H.s.Pream Kumar, GA for R2 & R3 Mr.P.Aishwarya, GA for R4.

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.02.2025 and to take suitable action on the th respondent in accordance with law.

said representation against the 5 th respondent is the

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 5 Chairman of Panruti Muncipality and one Sri Brammanatha Swamy Construction th wherein one R.Prema is a partner, who is none else than the daughter of the 5 respondent. As per the guidelines envisaged the tenderer should not be a relative either to Chairman of Municipality or to Commissioner of Municipality or to any th respondent by abusing the power granting the Councilor of the municipality. The 5 2/5

tenders to the contractor M/s.Sri Brammanatha Swamy Construction, which is against the tender rules and regulations. Hence, the petitioner made representation dated 06.02.2025 to the respondents 1 to 4 and the same was received by them on 07.02.2025, but no action was taken so far, hence the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 06.02.2025 will be considered on merits and in accordance with law within the time frame stipulated by this Court.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for R1 and the learned Government Advocates appearing for the respondent 2 to 4 and perused the materials available on record.

5. This Court directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.02.2025, after giving due notice to the petitioner and the interested 3/5

parties and opportunity of hearing, on merits and in accordance with law and to consider the documents filed by the parties and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.This writ petition is disposed of, with the above observations and directions. No costs.

09.07.2025 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No smn/tsh To 1.The Commissioner Panruti Municipality, Panturi, Cuddalore District - 607 106.

2.The Managing Director Municipal Administration MRC Nagar Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600028. 3.The Regional Director Municipal Administration Chengalpattu Zone, Kattankolathur Maraimalai Nagar,Chennai 4.The District Collector Cuddalore District Cuddalore.

4/5

N.MALA, J.

smn/tsh 09.07.2025 5/5