Madras High CourtCRP/1819/2016dismissed as infructuous

J.Kothandaraman v. S.Ramya

2017-02-01Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.02.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA CRP PD.No.1819 of 2016 and CMP No.9514 of 2016 J.Kothandaraman ... Petitioner Vs S.Ramya

...Respondent

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 06.07.2015 made in I.A.No.30 of 2014 in HMOP No.50 of 2013 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ponneri. For Petitioner ::

Mr.N.Ramiah For Respondent ::

Mr.P.K.Flavaasan

O R D E R

This revision is filed by the husband/petitioner against the award of maintenance to the wife/respondent.

2.Heard both sides.

3.The HMOP was filed by the husband under section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act 1956 for dissolution of the marriage. The order

impugned was passed on 06.07.2015 directing the payment of PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J.

VRI Rs.7500/- per month against the claim of Rs.10,000/- made by the wife /respondent. It is now stated that subsequent to the filing of the revision in April, the O.P. itself was dismissed on 18.06.2016 for default and so far, no steps had been taken for restoration of the same. In fact, earlier this court as a condition had directed the revision petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- which has already been complied with. As the main O.P. itself is dismissed, the revision automatically has become infructuous. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is open to the wife/respondent to take appropriate steps for maintenance in the manner known to law. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

01.02.2017 vri To The Subordinate Judge, Ponneri.

CRP PD No.1819 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in