← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/12213/2024granted

Ajithkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-06-27Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi6 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(II)(C), 29(1), 25 of NDPS Act, in Crime No.300 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused person were found in illegal possession of 21 kgs of Ganja. Based on the confession of co-accused, the petitioner was implicated in this case. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that based on the confession of co-accused, the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case and there was no contraband recovered from this petitioner. However, on Page No.1/6

instructions, the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a some amount to any charitable purpose. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the investigation is almost completed. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the investigation is almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period fifteen days from the date on which, the order copy is made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi, on Page No.2/6

condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of the Registered Advocate Clerk Association, Gummidipoondi, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/ receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

Page No.3/6

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two months and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

Page No.4/6

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 27.06.2024 msrm Page No.5/6

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

msrm Crl.O.P.No.12213 of 2024 27.06.2024 Page No.6/6