Radhakrishna Naidu v. Varadharaja Kounder

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.12.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A. No.1633 of 2002 and C.M.P.No.9519 of 2003 Radhakrishna Naidu ..Appellant Vs.

Varadharaja Kounder ..Respondent Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and the decree dated 18.12.2001 passed in A.S.No.12 of 2001 on the file of Sub-Court, Panruti reversing the judgment and the decree dated 14.12.2000 passed in O.S.No.504/95 by the District Munsif's Court Panruti. For Appellant : Mr.R.Meenal For Respondent : Mr.R.Gururaj

J U D G M E N T

Both counsel present. It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the sole appellant had died and it is seen that steps had not been taken to bring the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record. Endorsement also made to that effect.

2. In the light of the above position, in as much as no steps had been taken to bring the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, there is no purpose in keeping this second appeal further pending.

3. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-vii) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mm https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The District Munsif Court, Panruti.

2. The Sub Judge, Panruti.

3. The Record keeper, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras. (2 copies) +1cc to Mr.R.SUBRAMANIAN, Advocate, S.R.No. 90350 +1cc to Mr.R.GURURAJ, Advocate, S.R.No. 90122 S.A. No.1633 of 2002 and C.M.P.No.9519 of 2003 NRI(CO) TR(29/01/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/