V.Nandhini v. The Inspecto Of Police
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI , J.
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 427, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.31 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel arose between the defacto complainant and the petitioners while the petitioners came to visit their own agricultural land. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that when the petitioners came to visit their own agricultural land, a 1/4
wordy quarrel arose between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant. Hence, the complaint has been lodged. He further submitted that no one was injured in the said incident.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions and that the petitioners are ready and willing to deposit some amount to the credit of Crime No.31 of 2022, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each to the credit of Crime No. 31 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, and on such deposit the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Thiruvallur on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned 2/4
Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand Only) each to the credit of Crime No.31 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready and the defacto complainant is permitted to withdraw this amount.
[c] the final order in respect of the said deposit shall be passed by the learned trial Judge at conclusion of trial; [d] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;
[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
3/4
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI , J.
rsi/vga [f] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[g] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[h] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
11.05.2023 rsi/vga 4/4