Siddique v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.01.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.30341 of 2015 Siddique ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

2. The Inspector of Police,, Vaniyambadi Police Station, Vellore District.

... Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner except by due process of law to secure the ends of justice. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents :

Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor.

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner except by due process of law.

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, based on the complaint given by some third party, the respondent police is frequently calling the petitioner and harassing him.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that absolutely, there is no complaint as against the petitioner with the respondent police. The respondent police did not call the petitioner for any enquiry.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The above said statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded. Based on the statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the criminal original petition is dismissed.

vsi s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

2. The Inspector of Police,, Vaniyambadi Police Station, Vellore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor,High Court, Madras.

+ 2 ccs to Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, Advocate SR 926 & 638 scd(co) prk19/1 Crl.O.P.No.30341 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/