Madras High CourtCRL OP/13257/2021dismissed

Ravi Venkatachalapathy v. State Rep By

2021-08-05Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13257 of 2021 RAVI VENKATACHALAPATHY [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AVINASI, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.4/2021) For Petitioner : M/S.C.S.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested on 11.05.2021 and remanded to judicial custody for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 506(ii) IPC and Section 9(n) r/w 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012, in Crime No.4 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are close relatives. The petitioner had invited the defacto complainant for some ceremony. Further, the daughter of the defacto complainant and her mother participated in the function. Further, the petitioner is alleged to have taken the daughter of the defacto complainant and sexually assaulted on her.. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the alleged offences and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has been jail from 11.05.2021. Hence he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the statement of 164 Cr.P.C has been recorded , in which, she has stated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

that there is a serious allegation made against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court is of the view that on perusal of the 164 statement, there is serious allegation made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 05/08/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AVINASI, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.C.S.SARAVANAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.13257/2021 Date :05/08/2021 INBA 31/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/