Maheswari v. Muthalammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.01.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.A.No.1645 of 2002

1. Maheswari

2. Shankar

3. Minor Ramesh Minor rep. by mother and next friend Maheswari ... Appellants Vs.

1. Muthalammal

2. Rani

3. Lakshmi

4. Shanthi

5. Sumathi (5th respondent remained exparte and hence notice need not be sent to her) ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the learned Fast Track Court II, Tindivanam in A.S.No.28/2002 dated 08.05.2002 preferred against the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif of Vanur in O.S.No.96 of 1995 dated 22.12.1997.

For Appellants : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants reports no instructions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the Second Appeal is closed. No costs.

Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

1. The Fast Track Court II, Tindivanam.

2. The District Munsif, Vanur.

3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A. No.1645 of 2002 VC (30/01/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/