N.Senthil Vadivu, v. The Chief Educational Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.04.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATRUGHANA PUJAHARI W.P No.20039 of 2016 & WMP. No.17270 of 2016 N.Senthil Vadivu ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Chief Educational Officer, Office of Chief Educational Office, Erode.

2. Mr.Duraisamy ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider leave i.e., 29.10.2010 to 04.11.2010, 05.11.2010 to 11.11.2010 and 12.11.2010 to 25.11.2010 as medical leave, earned and unearned leave based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.08.2015.

For Petitioner ... No Appearance For R1 ... Mr.P.Raja Govt. Advocate

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 16.04.2018, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence the matter was directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal" today i.e., on 20.04.2018. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. 2.Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dn https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Chief Educational Officer, Office of Chief Educational Office, Erode.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.30330 W.P No.20039 of 2016 KAN(CO) CS/16/05/18 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/