Madras High CourtWP/18075/2017disposed of

K.Sivakumar, v. The Inspector General Of

2017-07-17Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.07.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.18075 of 2017 K.Sivakumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2. The District Registrar (Administration), Office of the District Registrar, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

3. The District Registrar (Administration), Office of the District Registrar, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.

4. The Sub Registrar, O/o Ulundurpet Sub Registrar, Panruti Road, Ulundurpet - 606 107, Villupuram District.

5. The Sub Registrar, O/o Pudupettai Sub Registrar, Pudupettai, Cuddalore District.

6. K.Ayyanar ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to take necessary action on the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2017 in respect of the fraudulent settlement Document No.2410/2015 as per order of the 1st respondent by his letter No.15974/U2/2017 dated 17.04.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai, Additional Government Pleader (R1 to R5)

O R D E R

Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 5. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for disposal in the admission stage itself.

2.The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 3rd respondent to take necessary action on the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2017 in respect of the fraudulent Settlement Deeds executed by the 6th respondent dated 30.09.2015 as per order of the 1st respondent dated 17.04.2017.

3.Pursuant to the representation given by the petitioner dated 04.04.2017, the 1st respondent, by letter dated 17.04.2017 sent the same to the 3rd respondent to enquire into the matter and pass orders. However, the 3rd respondent has not passed any order so far.

4.Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 submitted that the 3rd respondent may be directed to pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 6th respondent. 5.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the Writ Petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.04.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 6th respondent, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar va