Madras High CourtWP/20057/2016dismissed as infructuous

P.R.Rangarajan, v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2018-07-20Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20-07-2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.20057 of 2016 And W.M.P.Nos.17280 of 2016 and 21251 of 2016 P.R.Rangarajan ..

Petitioner -vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, (E5) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2. The District Collector/Panchayat Inspector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

3. The Tahsildar, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District.

Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his Proc.Na.Ka.No.1439/2012/A3 dated 20.5.2016 and quash the same and direct the second respondent to consider the case of the petitioner and take a decision as the second respondent is one sided and predetermined.

For Petitioner - Mr.Akshm Sajin kumar for Ms.M.Srividhya For Respondents - Mr.M.Elumalai, Government Advocate.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar Svn To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu Represented by Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, (E5) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.The District Collector/Panchayat Inspector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

3.The Tahsildar, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District.

+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 49433.

W.P.20057 of 2016 KS(CO) SP(01/08/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/