R.Ravikrishnan v. Government Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05-03-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR WP No. 14001 of 2024 AND WMP NOS.15185, 38623 OF 2024 R.Ravikrishnan .. Petitioner vs.
1. Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary Housing and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009
2. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority rep.by its Member Secretary Thalamuthu Natarajan Building No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai 600 008
3. Kesari Kuteeram Association (Regd) Reg No.893/2000 rep by its Secretary Mr.A.Jayachandran New No.22, Old No.27 West Cott Road, Royapettah Chennai 600 014
(R3 impleaded vide order of Court dated 05.03.2025 in WMP No.38623 of 2024 in WP No.14001 of 2024) .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd respondent from anyway interfering with the petitioners flat at 8th floor (part) door no.27 Kesarikuteram Rams Apartments, West Cott Road, Royapettah, Chennai 14, particularly by way of demolition of the same, pending final determination of the petitioner's special Revision Petition under Section 80A and 80 (A)(3) of the Town and Country Planning Act by the 1st respondent dated 08.05.2024. For Petitioner :: Ms.V.Rishika Mary For Respondents :: Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.R.Sivakumar Standing Counsel for R2 Mr.Aadeish J.B for Mr.Richardson Wilson for R3
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) For the reasons stated in the affidavit, W.M.P.No.38623 of 2024 stands ordered and the proposed party is impleaded as the third respondent in the main writ petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already preferred a revision petition under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act before the Government. Stay petition also has been filed along with the revision petition. It is submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to pursue the revision petition.
3. That being so, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the revision petition pending before the Government. The said revision petition shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) (K.RAJASEKAR J.) 05-03-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ss
To
1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Housing and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009
2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai 600 008
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.
ss 05.03.2025