Madras High CourtCRL OP/15224/2020dismissed

Syed Mohamad Ikram @ Mohamad Syedd Akram v. The State Rep By

2020-09-28Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.Nos.15224 of 2020 Syed Mohamad Ikram @ Mohamed Syed Ikram ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Saravanapatty Police Station, Coimbatore District.

(Crime No.1231 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.1231 of 2020 pending on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. C. Ganesh Pandian For Respondent : Mr. M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 392 and 379 of I.P.C in Cr. No.1231 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per defacto complainant is that on 07.08.2020 the petitioners way the defacto complainant at knife point and robbed cell phone, cash, gold jewels, Silver Articles and ATM Cards belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner is a innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed cell phone, cash, gold jewels, Silver Articles and ATM Card belonging to the defacto complainant. He would further submit that this is the second anticipatory bail before this Court and the earlier petition in Crl.O.P.No.11939 of 2020 was dismissed and there is no change in circumstances and there are seven previous cases pending against the petitioner and 3 previous cases are similar in nature.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the fact and there are seven previous cases pending against the petitioner and there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. -sd/- 28/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, COIMBATORE.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARAVANAPATTY POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. C.GANESH PANDIAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15224/2020 Date :28/09/2020 cs 08/10/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/