Ramasamy v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.05.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Ramasamy : Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector, Namakkal District, District Collectorate, Namakkal.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Namakkal District, District Collectorate Building, Namakkal.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal.

4. The Tahsildar Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District.

: Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose the appeal dated 12.02.2014 filed by the petitioner in Grievance ID No.TN/REV/NMK/I/COLLMGDP/12FEB24/7725025.

For Petitioner :

Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy For Respondents :

Mr.U.Baranidharan Addl. Govt. Pleader for R.1 to R.4.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. All that the petitioner wants is disposal of the petition mentioned appeal. No exception can be taken to the said request. The second respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned appeal on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The interested parties will have to be necessarily heard before the final order is passed. I make it clear that I have

not gone into the merits of the matter. It is for the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.

3. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

24.05.2024 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No shr To

1. The District Collector, Namakkal District, District Collectorate, Namakkal.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Namakkal District, District Collectorate Building, Namakkal.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal.

4. TheTahsildar Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

(shr) 24.05.2024