Vickey Trades Rep. By Its v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.7.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.13391 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.15786 & 15787 of 2018 Vickey Trades Rep. by its Proprietor R.Senthil Kumar S/o Rajapandian No.150 GNT Road, Madhavaram, Chennai 110 ...

PETITIONER Vs.

1 The District Collector Tiruvallur District.

2 The Tahsildhar Madhavaram, Tiruvallur District.

3 The Assistant Engineer TANGEDCO, Madhavaram.

... RESPONDENTS Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records and quashing the impugned order of the second respondent vide R.C.Pdl. No. 371/2016/A1 dated 19.5.2018 by which the petitioners water unit was closed and sealed and consequently direct the respondents to pay suitable compensation to the petitioner for having illegally closed the said water unit and caused huge loss and loss of reputation to the petitioner within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ravi Ananda Padmanaban For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.V.Jayaprakashnarayanan, Spl.G.P.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the writ petitioner has submitted that the impugned order issued by the Tahsildar, Madhavaram against the petitioner is liable to be set aside since he is not the competent authority to issue the same. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Research Organization, State Ground & Surface water Resources Data

Centre, Taramani, Chennai 600 113 is the competent authority to issue such order. Therefore, the impugned order issued by the Tahsildar, Madavaram is liable to be set aside.

2. The learned Special Govt. Pleader appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that the second respondent herein have no jurisdiction to issue the impugned order. It should have been issued by the Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Area Ground Water (Division), CMWSB, Chennai. He has also submitted that the petitioner should also apply and get ground water clearance certificate from the Chief Engineer, State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, Taramani, Chennai as per G.O.Ms.113, dated 9.6.2016 based on the hydrogeological conditions.

3. Heard both sides. The impugned notice issued by the Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk against the petitioner under the Tamilnadu Groundwater (Development and Management) Act, (Tamilnadu Act 3 of 2003) is liable to be set aside. The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Area Ground Water (Division), CMWSB, Chennai is the competent authority. In the counter affidavit filed by the 5th respondent, it is admitted that error had occurred while issuing the impugned notice. In the impugned notice, it is wrongly mentioned that "The Tamilnadu Groundwater (Development & Management) Act, (Tamilnadu Act 3 of 2003) instead of Chennai Metropolitan Area Groundwater Regulation, 1987, inadvertently. It is also submitted that the former act was already repealed in the year 2013 and the later act is still in force. He has also tendered unconditional apology for the error occurred while issuing the impugned notice.

4. In such view of the matter, the impugned order, dated 19.05.2018 passed by the Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk is set aside. The petitioner is directed to approach the Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Area Ground Water (Division) CMWSSB, who is the competent authority to issue such order. The petitioner is given four weeks time to obtain Ground Clearance Certificate from the Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Area Ground Water (Division) CMWSSB. Since the petitioner is not drawing water, they have to apply before the Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Area Ground Water (Division), CMWSSB, Chennai. The petitioner has also obtained license from Food Safety & Standards Authority of India by order, dated 16.6.2017 and the same is valid till 4.8.2018.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner's application is still pending with the respondents.

copy of this order, within a period of one week. On receipt of the said application, the Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Area Ground Water (Division) CMWSSB shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merit within a period of four weeks thereafter. Till such time, the petitioner is permitted to carry on the drinking water transport business. 5 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vaan To 1 The District Collector Tiruvallur District.

2 The Tahsildhar Madhavaram, Tiruvallur District.

The Assistant Engineer TANGEDCO, Madhavaram 4 The Managing Director Chennai Metropolitan Area Groundwater (Directing) CMWSSB, Chennai +1cc to Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanaban, Advocate, S.R.No.46475 W.P.No.13391 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.15786 & 15787 of 2018 GSP(26/07/2018)