M.Veeramani v. Thenmozhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.10.2016

CORAM

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam C.R.P(NPD)No.2910 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 M.Veeramani ...Revision Petitioner Vs Thenmozhi . Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree passed by the learned Additional Sub Judge, Virudhachalam, in I.A.No.366 of 2009 in O.S.No.66 of 2005, dated 16.07.2009.

For Revision Petitioner : Mr.G.Parthasarathy for Mr.S.Sathish Rajan For Respondent : Mr.V.Anand

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order and decree passed by the learned Additional Sub Judge, Virudhachalam, in I.A.No.366 of 2009 in O.S.No.66 of 2005, dated 16.07.2009, to set aside the ex parte decree.

2.

Mr.G.Parthasarathy, the learned counsel, representing Mr.S.Sathish Rajan, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that even before the filing of this Civil Revision Petition, the learned Additional Sub Judge, Viruduchalam, passed a final decree in the Suit itself, and has also made an endorsement to that effect on the reverse of the memorandum of grounds of this Revision Petition today. 3.

Since it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner that even before the filing of this Civil Revision Petition, the Trial Court passed a final decree in the Suit, which is not disputed by Mr.V.Anand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, nothing survives in this Civil Revision Petition for any adjudication. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infrucutuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 06.10.2016 sd Index : yes/no

To The Additional Sub Judge, Virudhachalam.

S.M.Subramaniam, J., sd C.R.P(NPD)No.2910 of 2010 06.10.2016