Dr.S.Gobu v. The State Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.07.2018 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH W.A.Nos.2519 and 2668 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Dr.S.Gobu ..

Appellant in both W.As Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Director, Institute of Road Transport, Tharamani, Chennai - 113.

3.The Dean, Perundurai Medical College and Hospital, Perundurai, Erode District.

..

Respondents in both W.As Appeals preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 08.06.2010 made in W.P.Nos.5674 and 264 of 2010. W.P.No.264/2010:

To Call for the records relating to the order of the 3rd respondent in Ref.No.308/E2/Sa Po Ni/Pea Ma Ka Ma/2009 dt.7.12.2009 and the conditions of agreement in clause(1) and

(5) of the agreement dated 02.09.2006 executed by the petitioner in favour of the second respondent as null and void and to quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to treat the petitioner as deemed to have resigned with effect from 30.11.2009.(Prayer amended as per M.P.2/2009 dated 23.04.2010.) W.P.Nos.5674 of 2010:

To call for the records relating to the order of the 2nd respondent in his Letter No.2063/A4/IRT/94 dated 26.2.2010 and the conditions of agreement in Clause (1) and (5) of the Agreement dated 2.9.2006 executed by the petitioner in favour of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the 3rd respondent and to quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to treat the petitioner as deemed to have resigned with effect from 30.11.2009.

For Appellant ..

Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan in both the W.As For Respondents..

Mr.N.Sakthivel, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 in both the W.As Ms.Kala Ramesh for R2 in both the W.As R3 - No appearance in both the W.As COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) These writ appeals are directed against the order dated 08.06.2010 made in W.P.Nos.5674 and 264 of 2010. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the appellant reports no instructions. It is evident that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the writ appeals. Accordingly, the writ appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar mmi To 1.The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Director, Institute of Road Transport, Tharamani, Chennai - 113.

+1 CC to The Govt. Pleader sr 44002.

W.A.Nos.2519 and 2668 of 2010 SP(09/08/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/