Muvarasan v. The Inspector Of Police

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN. J., The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 465, 467, 468, 471, 472, 427 and 506 (i) of IPC in Cr.No.980 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that the petitioners had trespassed into the defacto complainant's property. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and a false case has been foisted against them due to previous enmity. He would submit that the petitioners have no previous case pending against them. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that there is a civil dispute between the parties to the prosecution. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his/her/their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond each for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) if the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

(d) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the

petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

24.05.2023 ab

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN. J., ab 24.05.2023 (1/2)