M.Akbarkhan v. The Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 05.01.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.30960 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 M.Akbarkhan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Collector, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai.

3.The Tahsildar, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai.

4.Vijayabharathi ... Respondents Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider petitioner's representation dated 14.09.2015.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi Government Advocate

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 04.01.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the Registry was directed to post the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' today. Even today, there is no https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sgl To 1.The Collector, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai.

3.The Tahsildar, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai.

W.P.No.30960 of 2015 svi co kra 20.01.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/