← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14025/2024disposed of

V.Bhuvaneshwari v. The Director General Of Police

2024-05-24Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.05.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN V.Bhuvaneshwari, W/o. Prakash ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Director General of Police, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi-600 054.

3. The Inspector of Police, M-6 Manali Police Station, Chennai.

4. Asha @ Nagavalli ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the 3rd respondent from interfering in the civil dispute of money transaction between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. 1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Arumugavel For Respondents : Mr. S.Vinoth Kumar Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 to R3

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to restrain the 3rd respondent from interfering with the civil dispute of money transaction between the petitioner and 4th respondent.

2. It is noticed that the petitioner has filed a complaint against the 4th respondent, which is culminated in the registration of F.I.R. in Crime No.35 of 2024 under Sec. 294(b), 323, 342, 506(ii) of I.P.C. and Sec.4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. The petitioner has now approached this court to restrain the 3rd respondent from interfering with the civil dispute of money transaction between the petitioner and 4th respondent.

3. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials available on record.

2/5

4. It is noticed that there a civil suit is pending as on date. At the same time, it cannot be summarily concluded that the dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent is only of civil nature. Be that as it may, the petitioner is directed to cooperate with the 3rd respondent in the purported complaint filed by the 4th respondent. The 3rd respondent is also directed to file a final report in Crime No. 35 of 2024 filed by the 4th respondent as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that petitioner shall not be harassed by asking the petitioner to visit the police station and remain in the police station or any day beyond sun set. Enquiry shall be done in presence of a lady officer.

5. With the said direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 24.05.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking/Non-speaking order rpp 3/5

To

1. The Director General of Police, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi-600 054.

3. The Inspector of Police, M-6 Manali Police Station, Chennai.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

4/5

C.SARAVANAN, J.

rpp 24.05.2024 5/5