Madras High CourtSA/1678/2002dismissed for default

Mrs.Valarmathi v. Mrs.Deivanai Ammal

2018-08-03Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.1678 of 2002

1. Valarmathi

2. Meena ... Appellants/2&3 Appellants Defendants 2&3 Vs.

1. Deivanai Ammal

2. Panchali

3. Jayakodi ... Respondents/Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri made in A.S.No.8 of 1995 dated 12.09.2001 upholding the Judgment and Decree of the learned District Munsif, Harur, made in O.S.No.1058 of 1984 dated 27.07.1990.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

In the previous hearing i.e., on 02.08.2018, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter has been posted today under the caption "for dismissal". 2.Today, during calling work, no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter has been passed over and taken up at 2.30 p.m., At that time also, there is no representation for the appellants. Appellants called absent. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msrm https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The learned Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri.

2.The learned District Munsif, Harur.

COPY TO :

THE SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT MADRAS S.A.No.1678 of 2002 CA(CO) ASK(23/08/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/