P.N.Manoharan v. The State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.20225 of 2019 in Crl.A.No.SR25065 of 2019 P.N.PRAKASH, J.

It is seen that A.Anbarasan (A2) and S.Prabhu Chandrakumar (A3) were convicted and sentenced by the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore vide judgment and order dated 22.03.2013 in C.C.No.2082 of 2004, but, they were acquitted by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai vide common judgment and order in C.A.Nos.84 and 88 of 2013. Challenging their acquittal, the de facto complainant has filed the present appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C.

2.The petitioner has raised substantial grounds and there are prima facie materials to show that there has been misappreciation of evidence by the Sessions Court, which had resulted in the acquittal of A2 and A3. Hence, special leave is granted.

3.Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.

02.08.2019 gya http://www.judis.nic.in