Prakash@Meganathan v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 29.09.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.15337 of 2020 Prakash @ Meganathan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State, rep. By, ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, E-5 Koovathur Police Station, Kancheepuram.

Crime No.76 of 2020.

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.76 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : M/s R.Sasikumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.76 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant namely Murugesan is that while he along with his wife were catching fish in Palar River, the petitioners along with other accused abused and attacked them with deadly weapons and they sustained injury. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner is a prohibition offenders The petitioner along with other accused abused the de-facto complainant and his wife and assaulted with deadly weapons. He would further submit that four (4) previous cases are pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner being a prohibition offender and he had already been involved in many previous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 29/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF- CUM- JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUKAZHUKUNDRAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-5 KOOVATHUR POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15337/2020 Date :29/09/2020 TA-08/10/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/