Rajini v. Superintendent Of Police

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., Today, the above Criminal Original Petition is posted under the caption ''For Being Mentioned'' at the instance of the learned Government Advocate [Crl. Side] appearing for the Respondents. 2.A memo filed by the learned Government Advocate [Crl. Side] regarding error an that was typed in the order in Crl.O.P.No.12133 of 2023 dated 25.05.2023.

3.The Petition was filed by Rajini, seeking the 2nd Respondent not to harass the Petitioner.

4.In the order, it is stated that the Petitioner coordinated with the pending investigation in Crime No.245 of 2021. The error is with regard to Crime No.245 of 2021. As per the Petition, the Petitioner had come before this Court against the 2nd Respondent. Whereas, Crime No.245 of 2021 is with regard to pending case before the 2nd Respondent Police / the Inspector 1/3

of Police, District Crime Branch, Salem.

5.Based on the memo, the Crime No.245 of 2021 mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the order is to be removed and print the current paper vide SPGP.No.681 dated 09.03.2023.

6.Registry is directed to carry out necessary corrections and issue fresh order copy.

06.06.2023 cda 2/3

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., cda 06.06.2023 3/3