Malik & Co.,Rep.By Its Prop. v. Sukhminder Singh,Prop.,Western

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:12.10.2017 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A. Nos.1029 & 1135 of 2001 and C.M.P.Nos.10748, 20869 of 2001 Malik & Co, represented by its Proprietor, Baghat Singh Malik, at No.27-A Thiruvengadam Street, Gugai, Salem, rep. by its Power Agent, Sri.N.Kailasam, No.1.Ramachandra Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-17.

..Appellant in S.A.No.1029/2001/ Plaintiff Sukhminder singh, Proprietor, Western Express at No.6/241, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Karambakkam, Porur, Chennai.

..Appellant in S.A.No.1135/2001/ Defendant Vs.

Sukhminder singh, Proprietor, Western Express at No.6/241, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Karambakkam, Porur, Chennai.

Now at No.22-A M.G.R.Road, Kalashetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai-90.

..Respondent in S.A.No.1029/2001/ Defendant Malik & Co, represented by its Proprietor, Baghat Singh Malik, at No.27-A Thiruvengadam Street, Gugai, Salem.

..Respondent in S.A.No.1135/2001/ Plaintiff Prayer in SA.No.1029/01:- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Learned VII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai in A.S.No.214/99 dated 14.11.2000 on Appeal from the Judgment and decree of the Learned I Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai in O.S.No.10940/96 dated 21.06.1999.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Prayer in SA.No.1135/01:- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 14.11.2000 in A.S.No.214/1999 on the file of the VII Additional City Civil Judge,Chennai, Partially modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 21.06.1999 in O.S.No.10940/1996 of the file of the I Assistant Judge City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Appellants : No appearance in both appeals For Respondents : No appearance in both appeals C O M M O N J U D G M E N T These matters were listed on 11.10.2017 and on that day, there was no representation for the appellants as well as the respondents in both appeals. Accordingly, Registry was directed to list the matters today (12.10.2017) under the caption "for dismissal".

2. It is further found that the Registry has printed the names of the parties in cause list as directed.

3. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants as well as the respondents in both matters. Appellants called, absent in both matters. Resultantly, both appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitioners are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The learned VII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.

2. The learned I Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A. Nos.1029 & 1135 of 2001 SKV(CO) sm:14.12.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/