Arsath Ali v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.06.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.OP.No.14593 of 2022 Arsath Ali ..Petitioner/ A1 Vs.
State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Anaikaranchathiram Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District crime No.175 of 2022 ..Respondent PRAYER:
Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No.175 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.05.2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 352, 386 & 506(ii) of IPC in crime No.175 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 22.05.2022, when the defacto complainant was in his broiler chicken shop, the petitioner and another came to the shop and snatched Rs.700/- from his pocket at knife point. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that on the date of occurrence, the accused persons threatened the defacto complainant and snatched Rs.700/-. He would further submit that the petitioner is having five previous cases. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two blood related sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sirkazhi and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall stay at Chennai and report before the Inspector of Police, Egmore Police Station, Chennai daily at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
-sd/- 24/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIRKAZHI.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NAGAPATTINAM [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAIKARANCHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, MAYILADUTHURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL, NAGAPATTINAM.
5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EGMORE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.
+1CC to M/S.M.VIJAYA RAGAVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.9881 CRL OP.14593/2022 Date :24/06/2022 CSK 24/06/2022