C.Paul Raj v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.02.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.No.3252 of 2015 C.Paulraj

...Petitioner

vs.

1. The Commissioner of Police, Police Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

2. The Inspector of Police, Royapet Police Station, Royapet, Chennai.

...Respondents

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.12.2014. For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Radhakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the second respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.12.2014.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondents-Police submitted that on the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry was conducted and it was found during enquiry that there was dispute regarding commission payable to the petitioner and no such incident took place as stated in the complaint regarding https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

using of filthy language by the accused and therefore, the enquiry was closed.

3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. However, the respondents are directed to give copy of the closure report to the petitioner for taking further action in the manner known to law. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jvm To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Police Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

2. The Inspector of Police, Royapet Police Station, Royapet, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.3252 of 2015 SAI (CO) PSI (02.03.2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/